Starlink vs HomeFi for Rural Internet: I Tested Both for 60 Days

My house is 14 miles from the nearest cable line. For the last three years, I’ve been on satellite internet — first HughesNet (miserable), then Viasat (less miserable, still bad). When Starlink opened up residential service in my area, I signed up immediately.

For 30 days, Starlink was the best internet I’d ever had at this address.

Then I saw an ad for HomeFi and decided to test it side-by-side for the next 30 days.

The comparison was not what I expected.

The Setup Difference

Starlink: Ordered the dish kit ($599 upfront), waited 6 days for shipping. Setup took 90 minutes: mounting the dish on the roof, running cable, configuring the router. Starlink’s app picks the installation location via obstruction scan — the process is genuinely well-designed. Monthly plan: $120/month, no contract, but the $599 hardware cost is non-refundable after 30 days.

HomeFi: A router device arrived in 2 days. Plugged in. That was it. No dish. No roof mounting. No installation. Monthly: $89/month, no contract, cancel anytime.

The setup comparison isn’t close.

Speed Results — Month 1 (Starlink Only)

I ran 3 speed tests daily using Speedtest.net and Fast.com, rotating test times to capture different usage patterns.

Starlink residential averages over the first 30 days:

• Download: 142 Mbps average, range 67–287 Mbps
• Upload: 18 Mbps average, range 8–41 Mbps
• Latency: 32ms average
• Outages: 4 total, averaging 11 minutes each (3 were weather-related)

This is legitimately fast. 142 Mbps handles 4K streaming, video calls, and file transfers without issue. The 32ms latency is low enough for gaming and video conferencing. The weather sensitivity is real — during a heavy rainstorm, I lost connection twice in month 1.

Speed Results — Month 2 (HomeFi Added)

I kept Starlink running and added HomeFi as a parallel connection, testing both simultaneously from the same location.

HomeFi uses cellular network aggregation — it pulls signal from multiple carriers simultaneously (AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon) and routes traffic through the strongest available connection. In practice, this means performance varies based on which carrier has the best coverage at your specific location.

My results over 30 days:

• Download: 87 Mbps average, range 31–184 Mbps
• Upload: 23 Mbps average, range 12–47 Mbps
• Latency: 41ms average
• Outages: 1 total, lasting 23 minutes (carrier tower maintenance, per HomeFi support)

HomeFi’s upload speed was consistently faster than Starlink’s — meaningfully so for video calls and file uploads. Download speed was lower on average but adequate for all normal residential use. Streaming, conferencing, browsing: all worked without issue.

The key difference: HomeFi had one outage in 30 days. Starlink had four.

Where Starlink Wins

Raw download speed for bandwidth-intensive workloads. If you’re regularly transferring large files, running multiple 4K streams simultaneously, or need low-latency gaming connections, Starlink’s 142 Mbps average beats HomeFi’s 87 Mbps materially.

Starlink also has clearer coverage visibility — you know from the app whether your address qualifies before ordering.

Where HomeFi Wins

Everything else.

Cost: $89/month vs $120/month. $31/month gap = $372/year. After the $599 Starlink hardware, you don’t break even on HomeFi for 19 months, but from month 20 onward you’re saving $372/year indefinitely.

Portability: HomeFi works wherever you have cellular coverage. I tested it in my truck and at a campsite 40 miles from home — same performance. Starlink’s residential plan is tied to your service address. (Starlink does offer a portable/roam option at $165/month — this changes the math significantly if you travel.)

Reliability in bad weather: During heavy rain, Starlink degraded. HomeFi didn’t, because cellular signals are less affected by precipitation than Ka-band satellite signals.

No upfront cost: This matters more than the monthly comparison for most people. $599 is a real barrier. HomeFi costs nothing to start.

Who Should Use Which

Starlink is better if:

• You need 150+ Mbps regularly (large file transfers, multiple 4K streams, gaming)
• You’re in a location with poor cellular coverage from all three major carriers
• You plan to stay at the same address for 3+ years (hardware cost amortizes)
• You travel in an RV and want to upgrade to Starlink’s portable tier

HomeFi is better if:

• You need internet that works without installation (renting, RVing, seasonal use)
• 80–100 Mbps is sufficient for your household (it is for most)
• You don’t want a contract or hardware commitment
• You want to test rural internet without a $599 upfront cost
• You travel and want connectivity that works across locations

The Starlink vs HomeFi comparison tool runs the numbers side-by-side based on your specific situation — factoring in how long you plan to stay at the address, your actual speed requirements, and whether you need portability.

My Decision

I kept both for month 2. Starting month 3, I canceled Starlink.

The reason was simple: 87 Mbps handles everything I actually do, and the $31/month difference and single outage record made HomeFi the better value for my use case. If I were running a home office with frequent large video exports, I’d have kept Starlink.

For most rural households — streaming, calls, remote work without heavy file transfers — HomeFi is the more practical answer. No dish. No contract. No $599 bet on whether satellite latency meets your needs.

---

Free tool: Starlink vs HomeFi vs T-Mobile Home Internet — side-by-side comparison

Related: HomeFi Rural Internet Review 2026

Get HomeFi — ships in 2 days, no contract →

This article contains affiliate links. Speed test results are from my specific location and will vary based on local cellular coverage. Starlink pricing current as of June 2026.